7. Platanthera praeclara Sheviak & M.L. Bowles (western prairie fringed orchid)
Pl. 116 f, g; Map 478
Habenaria
leucophaea (Nutt.) A. Gray var. praeclara
(Sheviak & M.L. Bowles) Cronquist
Flowering
stems 25–85 cm long, the flowers 8–18 in a dense raceme. Main stem leaves 3–6.
Sepals 11–13 mm long, the upper sepal slightly shorter than the lateral ones,
light creamy white, usually greenish tinged toward the base. Lateral petals
10.5–15.0 mm long, broadly obovate to broadly spathulate, the tips cut straight
across or shallowly indented, sharply toothed or with a short fringe, light
creamy white. Lip 19–32 mm long, 3‑lobed, the lobes broadly fan‑shaped,
deeply fringed, light creamy‑white. Spur 36–55 mm long, 2.0–3.2 mm in
maximum diameter. Column 5.5–7.5 mm long, white, the viscidia 6.2–7.5 mm apart,
positioned so as to face forward (more or less parallel to each other). 2n=42.
June–July.
Uncommon,
known from mostly historical collections in western Missouri (Wyoming to Minnesota south to Oklahoma, almost exclusively in the Great Plains). Mesic portions of
upland prairies and bottomland prairies, often on calcareous substrates or on
loess‑derived soils.
As
with its eastern counterpart, P. leucophaea, this beautiful orchid has
been extirpated throughout a large portion of its former range because of the
plowing of many prairies and the overgrazing of others. It also is presently
listed as Threatened by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service under the federal
Endangered Species Act. The few extant stations for this species are all in northwestern
Missouri, and all occur in mesic upland prairies on loess‑derived
soils. Invasion of these prairies by woody plants appears to be the most
significant threat to the populations, aside from the continued threat of the
plow.
The
eastern and western prairie fringed orchids were first separated and
characterized by Sheviak and Bowles (1986). Although superficially similar
morphologically, producing similar, sweet fragrances, and pollinated
nocturnally by species of sphinx moths, these two beautiful orchids have
sufficiently different pollination syndromes that hybridization in nature is
unlikely. The closely placed, inwardly facing viscidia of P. leucophaea
deposit pollinia on a different portion of a potential pollinator’s eyes or
proboscis than do the more broadly spaced, outwardly facing viscidia of P.
praeclara.
Other
morphological trends also serve to separate the two taxa. Inflorescences of P.
praeclara tend to be shorter, more densely flowered, and fewer flowered
than are those of P. leucophaea, and the flowers of the former tend to
be larger, with longer sepals and spurs. There are also subtle differences
between the two species in lateral petal shape and perianth color.