7. Acaciella Britton & Rose (acacia)
About 15
species, North America to South America, most diverse in Mexico.
As traditionally
circumscribed, Acacia Mill. is the largest genus in the subfamily Mimosoideae,
comprising about 1,350 species widely distributed in the tropics and
warm-temperate regions of the world, and divisible into three large subgenera.
Beginning in the 1960s, systematists studying variation in overall morphology,
pollen morphology, and phytochemistry began making a case for separation of
three or more groups from within Acacia as separate genera. These
proposals were not accepted widely by the botanical community. With the advent
of molecular studies on the mimosoid legumes, it became clear that these three
large groups were more closely related to other genera of Mimosoideae than to
each other. However, because of the complexity of the relationships involved
and the inadequate number of species in this massive group sampled for molecular
work to date, details of how these lineages should be classified remain
unresolved (Miller and Bayer, 2003). Luckow et al. (2003) and Maslin et al.
(2003) reviewed the studies published to that time that provided evidence for
the breakup of Acacia, and they advocated the recognition of five to
seven total genera, with four of these containing species native to the New World.
With the growing
concern that three or more genera would be recognized in place of Acacia
in the broad sense, botanists began to discuss which of the major lineages
should retain the name Acacia and which should receive other names. This
is of more than taxonomic importance, as numerous species in the overall group
are cultivated around the world as ornamentals, for timber, and for various
other uses. The thought that, regardless of which group remained under the
well-known name Acacia, a large number of species would have to be
renamed under other, more obscure generic epithets caused lengthy and heated
nomenclatural discussions internationally. In the strict sense, the name Acacia
was first typified to represent a group of about 160 species of nearly
worldwide occurrence. However, Orchard and Maslin (2003) formally proposed that
the name Acacia be conserved with the type species of A. penninervis
Sieber ex DC., which belongs to a mostly Australian group traditionally known
as Acacia subgenus Phyllodineae (DC.) Ser. They argued that
because this represents by far the largest discrete assemblage (about 960
species) within the overall group, fixing the name Acacia on it would
result in the fewest required transfers of species to other genera when Acacia
is dismembered into more natural, smaller genera. After committees under the
auspices of the International Association of Plant Taxonomists reviewed the
proposal and gave it their tentative blessing, it received lengthy discussion
during the nomenclatural session at the most recent International Botanical
Congress, held in 2005 in Vienna, Austria. There the delegates voted to
formally approve the proposal. The result of this nomenclatural conservation is
that the generic name Acacia becomes associated with a group of about
960 mostly Australian species formerly called subgenus Phyllodineae
(DC.) Ser., including most of the species widely cultivated in warmer parts of
the world.
The studies of
Luckow et al. (2003), Maslin et al. (2003), and Miller and Bayer (2003)
supported the transfer of the A. angustissima complex, traditionally
called Acacia subgenus Aculeiferum Vassal section Filicinae
Vassal, to the genus Acaciella. However, aside from confirming that this
group is distinct from other American acacias, none of these workers was able
to provide strong evidence for a close relationship with any particular group
within the mimosoid legumes. Further research will be necessary to resolve this
issue. Acaciella is notable for the absence of spines, thorns, prickles,
and rachis glands, the presence of dehiscent fruits, seeds lacking an endosperm
and an aril, and details of pollen ultrastructure and morphology.