20. Euthamia (Nutt.) Cass. (flat-topped goldenrod)
(Sieren, 1970, 1981)
Plants perennial
herbs, often colonial from relatively long-creeping, branched rhizomes, often
somewhat aromatic, the stem bases sometimes somewhat woody. Stems usually
solitary, erect or ascending, with few to many ascending branches above the midpoint,
with often relatively coarse, longitudinal ridges, glabrous or less commonly
sparsely pubescent with minute, spreading hairs. Basal and lower stem leaves
absent at flowering. Stem leaves gradually or relatively abruptly reduced
toward the tip of the stem, sessile or nearly so, the blade linear to narrowly
lanceolate, sharply pointed at the tip, more or less tapered to a slender or
slightly expanded but not clasping base, the margins entire but sometimes
roughened with minute, stout, ascending, stiff hairs, the surfaces glabrous or
less commonly sparsely to moderately pubescent with minute, spreading hairs
mostly along the veins, slightly to strongly resinous with small, impressed or
somewhat pustular glandular dots. Inflorescences appearing as relatively dense,
flat-topped panicles, the heads solitary or more commonly in small clusters at
the branch tips, the stalks mostly short, with relatively few leaflike, linear
to elliptic bracts 0.2–1.0 cm long. Heads radiate, slightly to strongly
resinous-sticky. Involucre 3–6 mm long, cup-shaped to nearly cylindrical.
Involucral bracts in 3–5 unequal, overlapping series, linear to narrowly
oblong-lanceolate or lanceolate, the ascending tips rounded to less commonly
bluntly or sharply pointed (sometimes in the same head), often somewhat concave
or thickened along the midvein, entirely straw-colored to light yellow or some
of the bracts with a short, elliptic to obovate green area toward the tip,
glabrous, slightly to strongly resinous. Receptacle flat or slightly convex,
with low, toothlike ridges around the attachment points of the florets,
sometimes also with short, fine hairs. Ray florets 7–35, pistillate, the
corolla 1–3 mm long, ascending to somewhat spreading, yellow, not persistent at
fruiting (but sometimes trapped irregularly by the pappus and resinous
exudate). Disc florets 3–13, perfect, the corolla 1.5–4.0 mm long, yellow, not
persistent at fruiting (but sometimes trapped irregularly by the pappus and
resinous exudate). Pappus of the ray and disc florets similar, of numerous
slender, finely barbed bristles about as long as the corollas, white. Fruits
0.5–1.5 mm long, more or less oblong-elliptic in outline to slightly obovate,
circular in cross-section or very slightly flattened, faintly 2–4-nerved, the
nerves often difficult to observe, the surface moderately pubescent with fine,
ascending, white to somewhat silvery hairs, straw-colored to light tan to light
greenish brown, sometimes with slightly darker nerves. Five to 8 species,
temperate North America; introduced in Europe, Asia.
Traditionally, Euthamia
was considered part of Solidago (Steyermark, 1963). In his doctoral
dissertation, Sieren (1970) presented data suggesting that although the plants
have superficial similarities to that genus, there are strong differences in
some morphological features of the heads as well as the anatomy of the leaf
glands. He suggested a closer relationship between Euthamia and a group
of genera related to Gutierrezia. Anderson and Creech (1975) studied details
of leaf anatomy in the group and also concluded that Euthamia and Solidago
should be regarded as distinct genera. More recently, molecular research
(summarized by Beck et al., 2004) has supported the hypothesis of separate
lineages and generally upheld the notion of a close relationship between Euthamia
and the Gutierrezia group.
At the species
level, the differences between the eight species accepted by Sieren (1981) are
often fairly subtle and there is a lot of morphological variation within and between
populations of each species. Some workers have suggested that there are fewer
actual species in the genus (Nesom, 2000). There has not been a recent
comprehensive review of the genus, thus the specific and infraspecific taxonomy
remain somewhat controversial.