Home Flora of Missouri
Home
Name Search
Families
Volumes
Eragrostis pectinacea var. miserrima (E. Fourn.) Reeder Search in IPNISearch in Australian Plant Name IndexSearch in NYBG Virtual HerbariumSearch in JSTOR Plant ScienceSearch in SEINetSearch in African Plants Database at Geneva Botanical GardenAfrican Plants, Senckenberg Photo GallerySearch in Flora do Brasil 2020Search in Reflora - Virtual HerbariumSearch in Living Collections Decrease font Increase font Restore font
 

Published In: Phytologia 60(2): 154. 1986. (Phytologia) Name publication detailView in Biodiversity Heritage Library
 

Project Name Data (Last Modified On 7/9/2009)
Acceptance : Accepted
Project Data     (Last Modified On 7/9/2009)
Status: Native

 

Export To PDF Export To Word

13a. var. miserrima (E. Fourn.) Reeder

E. arida Hitchc.

E. tephrosanthos Schult.

Spikelets mostly spreading from the inflorescence branches. 2n=60. July–October.

Introduced, uncommon and widely scattered (Colorado to California south to Texas, introduced farther east; Mexico, Central America, Caribbean Islands). Railroads and open, disturbed areas.

Steyermark (1963) considered this taxon (as E. arida) to be introduced in Missouri, because of the lack of occurrences in natural habitats. Its taxonomic status has been troubling to botanists for some time. Koch (1974), in his detailed study of the E. pectinacea complex, discovered that only the character of the angle of spikelet divergence from the inflorescence branches consistently separated it from true E. pectinacea, and that other characters involving spikelet size used by earlier authors did not separate them well. However, he maintained the two as separate species (E. pectinacea and E. tephrosanthos), based upon his inability to detect hybrids between them. Reeder (1986) reexamined the situation, noting that the spikelet divergence character can be difficult to observe in immature specimens and that a small proportion of the materials he examined could not be keyed out adequately using this character. He also suggested that hybrids in this group would be very difficult to detect morphologically and treated the taxa as varieties of a single species. Sutherland (1986) noted that plants referable to E. tephrosanthos in the Great Plains region might be confused with E. frankii but had consistently wider spikelets with slightly longer glumes and lemmas. He treated such plants as part of his concept of E. pectinacea without formal designation of varieties.

 
 


 

 
 
© 2024 Missouri Botanical Garden - 4344 Shaw Boulevard - Saint Louis, Missouri 63110