5. Rorippa sinuata (Nutt. ex Torr. & A. Gray) Hitchc. (spreading yellow cress)
Pl. 325 g, h; Map 1385
Plants perennial herbs, with rhizomes. Stems 10–40(–45) cm long, spreading to
ascending, sometimes rooting at the lower nodes, sparsely to densely pubescent
with minute, hemispherical hairs, these appearing scalelike after collapsing
upon drying. Leaves basal and alternate, 2–8(–10) cm long, the lowermost
petiolate, the base mostly clasping the stem with small, rounded auricles,
simple and wavy-margined to pinnately lobed or divided with 3–13 blunt lobes or
divisions, the lobes linear to irregularly ovate, the margins entire, wavy, or
with few, shallow, blunt teeth, the upper surface glabrous, the undersurface
sparsely to densely pubescent with minute, hemispherical hairs, these appearing
scalelike after collapsing upon drying. Sepals 2–4 mm long. Petals 4–6(–7) mm
long, yellow. Styles 1–2 mm long, the stigma no wider than the style. Fruits 5–12
mm long, 1.5–2.0 mm wide, oblong, straight or slightly arched upward. Seeds
mostly 25–80 per fruit, in 2 rows in each locule, 0.9–1.1 mm long, angular,
ovate, or nearly circular in outline, the surface with a fine, netlike or
honeycomb-like pattern of ridges and pits, light yellow. 2n=16. April–September.
Scattered mostly along the floodplains of the Mississippi and Missouri Rivers
(western U.S. and adjacent Canada east to Illinois and Arkansas). Banks of
rivers; also edges of crop fields, railroads, roadsides, and open, disturbed
areas.
The odd hemispherical hairs, which are visible only with magnification, are a
distinguishing feature of this species. The stems frequently form loose mats.
Stuckey (1972) hypothesized that the species originated in the Rocky Mountains
and subsequently migrated down major river drainages eastward through the Great
Plains.
A small number of historical collections from St. Louis and Jefferson Counties
appear somewhat intermediate between R. sinuata and R. palustris.
Because these have relatively large petals and appear rhizomatous, they would
key to the former species, but they are atypical in their pubescence and leaf
division pattern. The lack of extant sites for plants with this morphology has
hampered a more detailed study of their putative hybrid origin.