9. Rubus argutus Link
Pl. 542 h, i; Map
2507
Canes to 450 cm
long and 120–400 cm tall, 3–7 mm in diameter. Prickles sparse, 0.3–1.0 per cm
of cane, 4–5 mm long, sometimes strongly downward-curved near the tip of the
cane. Petioles with sparse to dense nonglandular hairs, armed with downward-curved
prickles to 2 mm long. Stipules 6–13 mm long, linear to threadlike. Primocane
leaflet margins finely to sharply toothed, the upper surface thinly hairy, the
undersurface velvety hairy. Central primocane leaflets 5.0–13.5 cm long,
2.5–5.5 cm wide, narrowly elliptic, often less than 1/2 as wide as long,
rounded to angled at the base, angled (or occasionally tapered) to a sharply
pointed tip, the leaflet stalk about 1/10–1/4(–1/3) as long as the leaflet
blade; lateral leaflets resembling but smaller than the central leaflet, the
middle pair stalked, the basal pair nearly sessile. Inflorescences typically
racemose or clustered, (4.5–)6.0–12.0 cm long, 3–5 cm wide, with 2–5(–11)
flowers and 3–7 bracts, these typically jaggedly toothed, about evenly divided
between simple bracts and those with 3 leaflets; flower and inflorescence
stalks rather delicate, with nonglandular hairs and occasional needlelike or
small, downward-curved prickles. Sepals 4–5 mm long, 2.5–3.0 mm wide,
ovate-triangular, tapered to a sharply pointed tip or abruptly tapered to a
short, slender point. Petals 7–13 mm long, narrowly obovate. Fruits 9–14 mm
long, 7–12 mm wide, short cylindric. 2n=14, 21. May–June.
Scattered,
mostly south of the Missouri River (southeastern U.S. west to Texas and
Oklahoma). Bottomland forests, mesic upland forests, banks of streams and
spring branches, swamps, ledges and tops of bluffs, glades, and upland
prairies; also pastures, fencerows, margins of crop fields, and roadsides.
A white-fruited,
horticultural variant, cv. ‘Crystal White’, closely resembles R. argutus,
but has been recognized as a distinct species, R. louisianus A. Berger
by some botanists. Specimens from Oregon and Texas Counties may represent
escapes of cv. ‘Crystal White’ from cultivation, but such plants would key to R.
argutus in the present treatment and can only be distinguished from the
range of variation present in R. argutus when fruits are present.