Lespedeza Michx. (Clewell, 1966b)
Contributed by Jay A. Raveill
Plants herbaceous
perennials or shrubs, often with multiple stems from a woody caudex. Stems erect to
spreading, unbranched or branched, unarmed, sparsely
to densely pubescent with appressed to spreading, unbranched hairs. Leaves pinnately trifoliate, short- to long-petiolate.
Stipules hairlike to
linear-triangular or less commonly lanceolate,
herbaceous or more commonly papery, attached at the base, the margins entire,
pubescent on the outer face, with 1 or rarely few prominent, unbranched vein(s), persistent; stipels
lacking. Leaflets narrowly oblong to broadly ovate, the lateral leaflets
often slightly shorter than the terminal one, rounded or angled to a stalked
base, mostly rounded at the tip, sometimes shallowly notched or with an abrupt,
minute, sharp point at the very tip, the margins entire, the surfaces glabrous
or more commonly hairy, with a prominent midvein and
conspicuous pinnate secondary veins. Inflorescences ascending to spreading,
racemes or spikes (sometimes appearing grouped into panicles), or reduced to
few-flowered clusters, well separated to tightly clustered and obscuring the
inflorescence axis, the 3 bracts subtending each pair of flowers and 2 bractlets subtending each flower all minute, linear,
inconspicuous. Cleistogamous flowers often present,
usually mixed with open flowers in the same inflorescence. Calyces 5-lobed, the
lobes as long as or longer than the tube, nearly equal in length, but the upper
2 lobes fused nearly to the tip, minutely hairy, persistent but not enlarging
at fruiting. Corollas papilionaceous (highly reduced
in cleistogamous flowers), glabrous, pinkish purple,
yellowish, or cream-colored, often with purple near the base of the banner
petal, the petals tapered to a short, stalklike base,
the banner broadly obovate to oblong-obovate, abruptly curved-ascending above the midpoint, the
wings oblong, about as long as and sometimes slightly fused to the keel toward
the tip, the keel oblanceolate and curved in outline,
boat-shaped. Stamens 10, 9 of the filaments fused and 1 free nearly to the
base, the anthers small, attached near the midpoint, all similar in size. Ovary
ellipsoid to ovoid, sessile or short-stalked, the style slender, usually
glabrous, straight in chasmogamous flowers and recurved in cleistogamous
flowers, persistent at fruiting, the stigma small and terminal. Fruits modified
legumes, flattened, sessile or very short-stalked, those ripening from open
flowers mostly elliptic and slightly longer, those from cleistogamous
flowers broadly obovate to nearly circular and
slightly shorter, often with a raised network of nerves, indehiscent, 1-seeded.
Seeds slightly kidney-shaped to nearly circular in outline, sometimes with a
shallow notch at the attachment point, somewhat flattened, the surface smooth,
yellow or tan to nearly black, sometimes mottled. About 40
species, North America, Asia.
Lespedeza presents
considerable challenges because the species display significant morphological
variation. A number of additional species and infraspecific
taxa have been proposed to accommodate this variation, but in most cases these
do not seem discrete enough morphologically to warrant formal recognition. Much
of the complexity apparently arises due to hybridization (Clewell,
1964, 1966a, c). The eight native species in Missouri could produce 27 possible
biparental hybrids, and Clewell
(1966b) has hypothesized each of these crosses based on progeny arrays reared
in a garden from putative hybrid plants, field observations of co-occurring
species, and examination of herbarium specimens. Offspring from crosses
involving morphologically disparate species, for example from yellow-flowered
taxa crossed with purple-flowered ones, can be conspicuous. However,
hybridization between similar species may go undetected and could account for
the seeming morphological continuum among similar species, for example the
problems in distinguishing L. virginica, L. stuevei, and L. violacea.
Species frequently occur in mixed
populations, but the number of individuals showing hybrid morphology is
generally extremely low (less than 1%). Whenever aberrant plants are
encountered, collectors are encouraged to record associated Lespedeza species, as field observations
are among the greatest aids in determining the possible parental species of
hybrids. The use of hypothesized hybrid parental formulas is encouraged in
place of the many binomials that predate the appreciation of hybridization as a
causal agent of morphological diversity (they originally were named as species
rather than hybrids). The hybrid binomials, many of which were based on
Missouri specimens (Mackenzie and Bush, 1902) may still be used, but because
different crosses can result in similar hybrid morphology, some hybrid names
may include multiple parental combinations.
Because of the morphological complexity
of this genus, two keys are provided. One uses primarily vegetative features
and the other uses largely reproductive traits. The dual keys provide different
groupings, so important distinguishing morphology can be emphasized. Character
states and measurements represent the morphological variation encountered
within Missouri, and the following keys do not account for all of the variation
found elsewhere in the ranges of the species.